Review of Literature: Purpose and Sources
A literature review forms the backbone of any scholarly research by offering a comprehensive overview of existing knowledge on a particular topic. It contextualizes research, highlights gaps, and sets the foundation for new studies. This article explores the purpose of literature reviews and the various sources researchers can utilize, drawing exclusively from insights within the provided content.
A literature review provides a comprehensive summary of existing research on a specific topic, allowing researchers to familiarize themselves with the current state of knowledge in their field. Literature reviews are essential tools that facilitate a deeper understanding of a research topic, guide the development of new studies, and contribute to the overall advancement of knowledge within academic disciplines.
When conducting a literature review, it is essential to utilize a variety of sources to ensure a comprehensive understanding of the topic. The sources can be categorized into three main types: primary, secondary, and tertiary. Each type has distinct characteristics and serves different purposes in the research process. Using a diverse range of sources allows researchers to build a robust literature review that accurately reflects the state of knowledge in their field while identifying gaps for future research.
PURPOSE AND SOURCE OF LITERATURE REVIEW
Purpose of Literature Reviews
The purpose of a systematic literature review is to provide as complete a list as possible of all the published and unpublished studies relating to a particular subject area.
Contextualizing Research
A literature review serves to contextualize a study within the broader scope of existing knowledge. As Randolph (2009) suggests, it provides a framework for relating new findings to prior research, essential for advancing scholarship. By understanding the state of previous research, researchers can situate their work effectively.
Answering Research Questions
While a literature review itself does not answer research questions, it aids in summarizing the research topic and identifying key theories (Kraus, Breier, & Dasi-Rodriguez, 2020). This role is critical in framing and refining research questions and hypotheses (Ramdhani et al., 2014).
Building Knowledge
Conducting a literature review demonstrates an author’s grasp of relevant vocabulary, theories, and methodologies. It also identifies influential researchers and historical developments in the field (LeCompte et al., 2003). Systematic reviews, in particular, offer a comprehensive summary of both published and unpublished studies using rigorous criteria (Cronin et al., 2008).
Identifying Gaps
By highlighting inconsistencies or unexplored areas, literature reviews guide researchers to significant gaps in existing knowledge (Sridhar, 2020). This inspires new research directions and ensures that studies contribute meaningfully to the field.
Avoiding Duplication
A well-conducted literature review ensures that the researcher’s work does not unintentionally replicate existing studies (Janardhanan et al., 2019). It also prevents incidental plagiarism and ensures ethical research practices.
Supporting Theoretical Foundations
By synthesizing prior studies, literature reviews establish a theoretical foundation for research. They also help refine methodologies and define the scope of studies (Booth et al., 2021; Abdallah, 2024).
Figure 2
Sources of Literature Reviews
The quality of a literature review depends on a careful selection and reading of books, academic and professional journals, reports, thesis, conference proceedings, unpublished manuscripts, etc. Academic books and journals are in general, the most useful sources of information. The sources of resources need to decide based on the nature and the objectives of the research project.
Primary Sources
Primary sources provide first-hand evidence and include:
· Empirical studies, experiments, and direct observations
· Historical and legal documents
· Surveys, interviews, and fieldwork
· Creative works and digital recordings (Chigbu, 2023)
Such sources are invaluable for offering authentic insights and forming the core evidence base of a study. In sciences, these sources are typically found in scholarly articles, conference papers, and experimental reports.
Secondary Sources
Secondary sources interpret and analyze primary materials. Examples include:
· Journal articles discussing another researcher’s findings
· Review articles summarizing previous studies
· Books providing broader analyses of primary data (Ojimelukwe, 2018)
Secondary sources offer a synthesized perspective and are essential for identifying trends, debates, and consensus within a field.
Tertiary Sources
Tertiary sources compile information from primary and secondary sources, such as:
· Encyclopedias and dictionaries
· Almanacs and chronologies
· Abstracts and textbooks (Creswell, 2012)
These sources are particularly helpful for obtaining general overviews and contextual understanding, serving as a starting point for deeper investigation.
Figure 3
A comic on sources of Literature Review
Specialized Sources
Specialized sources cater to niche research needs and include:
· Theses and dissertations, providing detailed studies on specific topics
· Conference proceedings, offering the latest research updates
· Preprints, giving access to cutting-edge findings before formal publication (Lasanthika, 2021)
Digital and Online Resources
The digital era has expanded access to resources such as:
· Academic websites and repositories
· E-books, online journals, and digital archives
· Multimedia content, including podcasts and video lectures (Chigbu, 2023)
These resources ensure accessibility and convenience, especially for researchers seeking up-to-date information.
A literature review is a fundamental component of research, serving multiple purposes, from contextualizing studies to identifying gaps and avoiding duplication. Leveraging a diverse range of sources, including primary, secondary, and tertiary materials, enriches the quality and depth of a review. By meticulously synthesizing existing knowledge, researchers contribute to the evolution of their fields, paving the way for meaningful advancements.



